The logical case for integrated requirements

Strategic sourcing in a dual-use context is a delicate balancing act. You aren’t just buying parts; you are buying compliance, resilience, and scalability. An integrated requirements approach supports strategic sourcing in several ways:

• Sovereign reliability: Defense-grade sourcing requires ‘trusted foundries’ and friend-shoring, while commercial sourcing thrives on global cost optimization. Requirements should make it clear when each sourcing approach applies.
• Component commonality: Identifying components that can be shared across commercial and defense variants helps increase purchasing volumes and reduce overall costs. Without precise definitions up front, engineering will naturally ‘over-spec’ the civilian part, killing its market competitiveness.
• Lifecycle traceability: Dual-use contracts often require a ‘digital birth certificate’ for every component. Sourcing must define these data requirements early, or you’ll face a manual auditing nightmare later.
• Regulatory readiness: Sourcing must anticipate changes in ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) or EAR (Export Administration Regulations) status before the first purchase order is issued. 

Sourcing meets the ‘wall of silence’

Many sourcing challenges in dual-use development do not stem from supplier performance. They arise because procurement and engineering interpret requirements differently.

A commercial component may satisfy functional specifications yet lack the documentation required for defense qualification. Environmental requirements such as vibration, temperature range or electromagnetic compatibility may appear late in development, forcing costly supplier changes or requalification activities.

Cybersecurity presents another common example. If software assurance and supply-chain security are introduced only during compliance reviews, sourcing options become significantly more limited than they would have been if those requirements had guided supplier selection from the beginning.

The earlier these discussions happen, the more options remain available.

This early alignment is also reflected in collaborative initiatives such as the XR Labs, where companies, researchers, public authorities and end users use immersive technologies to co-design, test and validate dual-use solutions before they reach deployment. By refining requirements in realistic operational scenarios before supplier selection begins, organizations can make more informed sourcing decisions while reducing costly redesigns later in development.

The modular power-grid pilot

Consider a company developing portable microgrids for both disaster relief operations and military deployments.

By using an integrated requirements management tool, the sourcing team identified that 85% of the internal components could be dual-tracked. They defined a core requirement set that met 90% of defense ruggedization standards but remained cost-effective enough for civilian NGOs.

For the remaining 15% (the specialized, encrypted communications modules), they designed a plug-and-play architecture. This allowed them to use a standard, global supply chain for the main chassis while reserving hyper-secure ‘strategic sourcing’ exclusively for the sensitive modules.

The result: a 30% reduction in total COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) compared to building two entirely separate products.

A practical framework for sourcing decisions

To master strategic sourcing, you must manage and balance requirements across three distinct layers of the supply chain:

Looking ahead sourcing intelligence

Dual-use sourcing is becoming less about finding the lowest-cost supplier and more about building supply chains that remain adaptable as technologies, regulations and geopolitical conditions evolve.

That starts with requirements.

When sourcing, engineering and compliance teams establish a shared understanding of what the product needs to achieve – and why – they create far more flexibility later in development. The result is not only a more resilient supply chain, but also a product that can serve both commercial and defense markets without carrying unnecessary cost or complexity.

The post Requirements management as the foundation of dual-use strategic sourcing appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Requirements management as the foundation of dual-use strategic sourcing appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Testing the waters with the MVP approach

Launching with an MVP lets businesses test their digital product with early adopters, gather feedback, and iterate quickly. This lean method lowers the risk of creating a product that doesn’t appeal to consumers and minimizes upfront investment. The challenge lies in transitioning from a free or freemium MVP to a sustainable revenue model.

The paywall paradox: Balancing value and access

Paywalls are crucial for revenue but require careful management. Pricing, feature accessibility, and user experience must be carefully balanced to avoid alienating users and hindering adoption. A well-designed paywall gives consumers a strong incentive to pay and effectively conveys the value of a digital product.

Why make the switch

Free items are rarely long-lasting. In addition to increasing the product’s perceived value and desirability, implementing a paywall generates a consistent cash stream to support further development, maintenance, and expansion. Paywalls enable businesses to segment customers by willingness to pay, allowing them to customize products and pricing strategies for different consumer groups while also generating revenue.

The MVP and paywall strategy is applicable to more than just digital products. In education, free introductory courses or materials can lead to subscriptions to premium content or tutoring. Basic telehealth consultations in the healthcare sector may be free, while fees may apply to specialized services or personalized plans. While paid versions offer more sophisticated functionality and committed support, freemium software draws users in the manufacturing industry.

Challenges and effects on new business creation

There may be difficulties with implementing a paywall: 

• User resistance: Users accustomed to free access may be reluctant to pay for previously free features.
• Churn: Introducing a paywall can lead to customer churn if the value proposition is not clearly communicated.
• Pricing optimization: Determining the optimal pricing strategy that balances revenue generation with user adoption can be complex.

However, when executed thoughtfully, paywalls can transform new business creation. By providing premium features and tailored experiences that build or strengthen loyalty, they create steady and sustainable income streams, maximize profitability, and improve client lifetime value.

Exploring the digital landscape

A smart strategy to address the challenges of managing digital products and to create long-term income models is through the MVP and paywall approach. This strategy can be applied to a variety of industries to increase consumer value and spur the development of new businesses.

Paywalls, MVPs, and digital products all require strategic management. At Verhaert Strategic Innovation, we help businesses design and test MVPs, implementing paywalls that strike a balance between user experience and revenue generation, and matching digital product strategy with business objectives. We assist companies with every stage of the product lifecycle after launch, including customer journey optimization, feature improvement, and long-term value delivery.

By combining a customer-centric approach with data-driven insights and collaborating with experienced partners like Verhaert, businesses can successfully navigate the digital maze, adapt to evolving user needs, and unlock new opportunities for innovation and growth.

The post Product management, MVPs and the paywall paradox: Navigating the digital maze appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Product management, MVPs and the paywall paradox: Navigating the digital maze appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The compliance burden: A tax on agility

For a start-up that wants to grow quickly, the red tape of export controls is immense. It can turn a simple international sales opportunity into a six-month bureaucratic negotiation. Firstly, regulations struggle to keep pace with the rapidly evolving, intangible nature of technologies such as AI algorithms, advanced sensors and specialized software. This makes it difficult for companies to properly assess which regulations apply. This so-called ‘classification paralysis’ often leads companies to resort to ‘overcompliance’, classifying items as more restricted than necessary to mitigate significant legal risk.

Next, dual-use technology is often developed through international collaboration. The regulatory system is already very fragmented within the EU, as different EU member states interpret the same rules inconsistently. When global collaboration is factored in, the picture becomes even more challenging. For example, the US’s export regulations (ITAR) applies for any company that uses even a single US-sourced component.

This complex patchwork of rules creates a legal minefield and severely limits cross-border trade, manufacturing partnerships and necessary investment. Another complication is the ‘intangible’ trap. It refers to intangible technology transfers (ITTs) that are now subject to export controls, meaning that sharing expertise or design knowledge with a foreign national, even within an EU subsidiary, can trigger a lengthy licensing process. This limits the open, collaborative environment that fast-paced innovation depends on.

The stifling impact on scale and resilience

In addition to slowing sales down, the regulatory challenges also fundamentally undermine the strategic goals of the entire dual-use model. This regulatory risk obstructs financial de-risking, as venture capitalists may become wary of investing in companies whose primary market expansion is impacted by unpredictable regulatory timelines. If a start-up cannot guarantee a timeline for exporting a critical component to a European manufacturing partner, it loses credibility and access to the capital needed to scale.

Moreover, this system discourages the ‘spin-on’ process necessary for defense modernization. When a commercial firm, accustomed to fast contracts, faces years of compliance audits and security reviews, the incentive to engage the defense sector dissolves. And, in turn, will lead to technology stagnation and a widening military capability gap. Critically, because different nations have varying compliance standards, companies are often forced to customize products for specific defense clients, which discourages standardization and undermines the key economic benefit of dual use: mass manufacturing.

Orchestrating the solution

Given these challenges, successfully transitioning to dual-use innovation often requires external expertise that understands both the commercial market and defense constraints. This is where Verhaert Strategic Innovation competencies can offer a competitive advantage. The company helps organizations accelerate their business by acting as an innovation orchestrator that bridges the operational gaps created by regulatory complexity. They specialize in strategic sourcing, identifying core requirements and translating them into technology-agnostic challenge statements.

Crucially, they guide the development of Internal Compliance Programs (ICPs) within start-ups and SMEs, embedding security and classification into the product lifecycle from day one. By setting up and executing structured pilot projects under programs like CASSINI, Verhaert provides public buyers with the necessary de-risked validation data to confidently transition to scalable procurement.

Innovation in regulation

To fully harness the potential of dual use, the focus must shift from controlling everything to managing risk strategically. Institutions must work to simplify and standardize the licensing process, perhaps by creating EU General Export Authorizations (EUGEAs) specifically tailored for the export of established dual-use technology (such as COTS satellite components) to allied nations. Regulators should empower companies by providing clear, standardized guidance for robust Internal Compliance Programs (ICPs).

This will allow firms with certified processes to benefit from accelerated licensing. Rather than physically monitoring every piece of generic hardware, regulations should focus on controlling the deployment of sensitive AI algorithms and software code to keep up with the speed of digital change. The dual-use revolution promises a massive surge in both economic prosperity and security, but until the burden of regulatory red tape is effectively managed, that promise will remain stalled.

The post The red tape barrier: How export controls hinder the dual-use revolution appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post The red tape barrier: How export controls hinder the dual-use revolution appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Material matters: A stream-by-stream overview

Every material comes with its own set of trade-offs. Finding the right fit and innovation potential requires balancing performance with environmental impact:

• Aluminum: It is highly recyclable, but the initial production is incredibly energy-intensive. Current innovation focuses on increasing recycled content, lightweighting and improving collection infrastructure to reduce the carbon footprint.
• Cardboard: While renewable and widely recycled, issues such as deforestation and non-recyclable coatings remain. The goal is to source alternative fibers, simplify recycling processes and reduce the amount of material used.
• Glassware: It offers infinite recyclability but suffers from high transport costs due to its weight and fragility. Innovators are looking toward lightweighting, reusable packaging systems and logistics optimization to offset these hurdles.
• Plastics: Though the versatility and cost-effectiveness are unmatched, their reliance on fossil fuels is a major drawback. The industry is now pivoting toward bio-based plastics, improved recyclability and closed-loop systems.

The pitfalls of sustainable packaging innovation

More than just swapping materials, sustainable packaging requires systemic solutions. We generally see hurdles fall into three categories:

1. Technological hurdles

Sustainable materials don’t always offer the same performance as traditional packaging. Issues such as weaker barrier properties, reduced durability or limitations in print quality mean that further innovation is needed. At the same time, manufacturers are under pressure to scale quickly, even though adapting existing production lines to new materials can be both costly and technically complex. In addition, ensuring that sustainable packaging is genuinely recyclable or compostable usually requires substantial investment, not only in infrastructure but also in educating consumers.

2. Market challenges

Cost remains a major obstacle. Sustainable packaging solutions are often more expensive, which makes it harder to keep products affordable. Consumers may also avoid switching if they feel sustainability undermines convenience, appearance or product protection. On top of this, sourcing alternative materials and integrating them into existing supply chains often increases complexity and risk.

3. User challenges

For sustainable packaging to work in practice, it must be easy to use, easy to open and simple to dispose of. Clear and understandable labeling is crucial to helping consumers correctly recycle or compost packaging. Finally, widespread adoption relies on these solutions being consistently available across different retail channels, rather than limited to niche or premium offerings.

Piloting your way to success

Rather than jumping straight to a full-scale launch, FMCG companies can use strategic pilots at different points in the innovation journey to test assumptions and learn what truly works.

• Front-end innovation: Test consumer preferences for different materials, formats, and functionalities to guide early-stage innovation.
• New product development: Evaluate the performance of new sustainable packaging solutions in real-world conditions, ensuring they meet both consumer and product needs.
• New product introduction: Assess the feasibility of integrating sustainable packaging into existing manufacturing and distribution processes, optimizing for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

For these pilots and, more broadly, sustainable packaging innovation to succeed, multidisciplinary teams are essential.

• Material expertise: Deep knowledge of sustainable packaging materials and their properties.
• Technology scouting: Advanced tools to scout for out-of-the-box solutions at all technology readiness levels.
• Concept design: Creative concept and usability design to increase adoption rates.
• Consumer research: Conducting in-depth consumer research to understand preferences and behaviors.
• Target-based costing: Drive material selection, design, and manufacturing processes to meet the cost target while maintaining functionality and sustainability
• Pilot project design and execution: Designing and executing strategic pilots to de-risk innovation and ensure market success.
• Technology integration: Integrating cutting-edge technologies to optimize packaging performance and sustainability.

Ultimately, the circular packaging economy is not about finding a single ‘perfect’ material. It requires continuous optimization across the entire value chain. Lasting impact emerges where material expertise meets consumer-centric design. At Verhaert Strategic Innovation, we support FMCG companies in working through the challenges of sustainable packaging by combining deep technical expertise with a data-driven, pragmatic approach, helping create solutions that work for both consumers and the planet.

The post The sustainable packaging puzzle: Addressing the innovation challenges in FMCG appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post The sustainable packaging puzzle: Addressing the innovation challenges in FMCG appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Europe’s industrial landscape is reshaping fast to safeguard autonomy and sovereignty. Geopolitics, new regulations and rising costs are forcing companies to review their bills of materials, swap components and near-shore supply chains — moves that can introduce risks and cost pressures alongside new opportunities. This track delves into how to turn those challenges into a competitive edge. From robust supplier-selection processes and design-for-future-component swaps to advanced automation and quality inspection, we’ll show how design-to-cost methods combined with Industry 4.0 technologies — precision manufacturing, smart sensors, robotics and IoT-enabled platforms — can boost efficiency, manage risk and transform complexity into advantage. Check out the presentations from the Innovation Day of 2024 on:

• Next-gen efficiency with local processor platforms & OS innovations
  By Rudy Van Raemdonck, Coordinator EmbeddedLab at Verhaert Product Innovation
• Navigating nearshoring in Europe: A systems thinking approach
  By Thomas Degreef, Consultant PhysicsLab at Verhaert Product Innovation and Sam Van den Driessche, Consultant MechLab at Verhaert Product Innovation
• Cyber resilience for digital products: Addressing supply chain challenges in the European industry
  By Bart De Vos, Consultant EmbeddedLab at Verhaert Product Innovation and Jasper Bogaerts, Software Engineer at Verhaert Digital Innovation

View the presentation

The post Industry – Rebuilding industrial capacity and the innovation challenges it brings appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Industry – Rebuilding industrial capacity and the innovation challenges it brings appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Tip 1: Start with the problem, not the technology

It’s easy to fall into the trap of being fascinated by your own technology. As a researcher, you know every detail of how it works, but the market doesn’t. What matters is the problem it solves and why it’s better than existing solutions.

Trick: Begin with the pain points. Ask yourself what real-world challenges your technology could address. Look across industries and societal needs, is it inefficiency, cost, safety, accessibility or something else? Frame your technology as the answer to a tangible problem.

Example: If your breakthrough is a new sensor material, instead of highlighting sensitivity, ask: ‘What if we could detect pollutants in real-time at levels previously impossible?’ or ‘What if this sensor could make autonomous vehicles safer in bad weather?’.

Tip 2: Identify what makes your technology unique

You know your technology inside and out. Now distill it to the core features that set it apart and the advantages those features bring. Don’t just list what it is; explain what it does better and why it matters.

Trick: Use a simple Feature-Advantage-Benefit framework.

• Feature: What does your technology have? (ex. uses quantum entanglement)
• Advantage: What does that feature do better than alternatives? (ex. enables unhackable communication)
• Benefit: What does that advantage mean for the user or market? (ex. ensures complete data security for sensitive transactions)

Where possible, quantify comparisons. Instead of ‘Our battery lasts long’ say ‘Our battery lasts 50% longer than the leading competitor, extending drone missions by an extra hour’.

Tip 3: Think beyond the obvious: The ‘What else?’ game

Your initial research might have a clear primary application, but truly impactful technologies often have ripple effects into unexpected areas. Thinking broadly can uncover entirely new markets.

Trick: Play the ‘What else?’ game. Gather a diverse team (colleagues, industry contacts, even outsiders) and ask: ‘If this technology existed, what else could it be used for?’ Look for analogies: if it solves problem X in one industry, could it solve a similar problem elsewhere?

Example: A precise navigation system developed for autonomous vehicles could also improve robotic surgery or warehouse automation.

Dual-use lens: For technologies with dual-use potential, explicitly consider both commercial and defense/security applications. If it’s effective for medical diagnostics, could it also enhance battlefield triage? If it improves supply chain logistics, could it be applied to military readiness? This approach ensures you’re capturing all possible high-impact opportunities.

Tip 4: Validate with the market, not just the lab

Even the best hypotheses need market validation with real users. Assumptions alone won’t tell you whether your killer application is truly valuable.

Trick: Conduct customer discovery interviews. Talk to potential users, experts, and decision-makers. Ask about their pain points, current solutions, and what they wish existed. Listen more than you speak — their feedback will reveal if your application hits the mark, or uncover problems you hadn’t considered.

Example: If your material could improve dental implants, speak with dentists, surgeons, and manufacturers. Is the real issue cost, durability, biocompatibility, or something else entirely?

Tip 5: Iterate, prioritize and focus

Once you’ve identified potential applications and unique advantages, refine your list. You can’t pursue everything at once.

Trick: Evaluate applications using clear criteria: market size and growth, competitive landscape, feasibility, team alignment and potential impact. Don’t be afraid to pivot — the first idea you considered may not be the most viable or impactful. Start small, test, learn and scale up.

Finding the killer application that creates real-world impact

Transitioning from technology research to real market impact requires more than scientific insight, it demands a strategic approach to uncover the applications that truly matter and demonstrate tangible value. At Verhaert Strategic Innovation, we help organizations identify their technology’s killer application and translate its unique strengths into new business opportunities. So the question is: which of your innovations could unlock its full potential in the market and make a real difference in the world?

The post From lab bench to market impact: 5 tips for spotting your tech’s killer application appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post From lab bench to market impact: 5 tips for spotting your tech’s killer application appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Why the shift matters: Draghi’s warning on sovereignty

The dependence on industry-led innovation is not merely a path to cost-saving, it is a geopolitical necessity linked inextricably to economic resilience. Draghi’s report warns that Europe faces a critical triple dependency, encompassing the innovation gap with the U.S. and China, the decarbonization mandate, and the urgent need to shore up defense. He argues forcefully that Europe cannot afford to choose between these priorities, as they are deeply intertwined.

The reliance on industry is critical because the commercial sector iterates faster, meaning if a European Ministry of Defence (MoD) cannot rapidly integrate private-sector breakthroughs in AI edge computing or drone technology, it will inevitably fall behind adversaries unconstrained by traditional acquisition timelines. Furthermore, Europe’s fragmented defense industry has created a systemic vulnerability with costly duplication, a problem that can only be fixed by harnessing the scale of the private sector through dual-use production, thereby reducing dependency and creating essential economies of scale. Defense must field affordable capability, such as thousands of cheap counter-drone systems, and since government R&D cannot fund this scale, industry-led mass manufacturing is the only viable path to reversing the negative cost exchange ratio.

The impact on industry: Opportunities and reckoning

The dual-use imperative creates an enormous, complex opportunity for the European technology industry, but success demands radical internal change. The rising tide of European defense spending, fueled by Draghi’s analysis, signals a predictable, high-value demand signal never before seen in peacetime Europe, which offers a mandate for scale. Companies that embrace dual-use design can secure long-term, stable government contracts (anchor tenancy) to fund their capital expenditure, which effectively de-risks the long development cycle inherent in deep tech. Defense procurement, when done correctly, simultaneously forces standardization and modularity, making the company’s product line more efficient and competitive in the global commercial market.

To seize this opportunity, adaptation is critical for all players. Industry must embrace the dual-use model by designing hardware around COTS components and modular architectures that can serve multiple markets. This is to ensure the product is cheap enough for commercial scale and robust enough for security. Start-ups, for their part, must invest in bridging the cultural divide by actively engaging with defense innovation hubs and developing the necessary expertise in security compliance and government accounting. This helps them move beyond small grants to secure large procurement contracts. Critically, industry must avoid the fatal trap of fragmentation and duplication by resisting the urge to lobby for bespoke national contracts, a practice that ultimately weakens the EU’s industrial capacity..

Building the new space and dual-use ecosystem

The complexity of orchestrating this pan-European industrial and cultural shift requires specialized expertise. Verhaert’s strategic innovation model plays a vital role in accelerating this transformation by helping build the necessary ecosystems for CASSINI for new space and EUDIS for European Defence Industry actions. The teams actively facilitate business acceleration by leading entrepreneurship within scientific areas, incubating new start-ups and accelerating promising scale-ups across Europe. Moreover, they connect early-stage space companies with investors across the continent through dedicated matchmaking events. This process not only validates dual-use start-ups but also strengthens the European innovation community, providing the infrastructure and networks required to transform fragmented national capabilities into a cohesive, strategically resilient, European-wide industrial base.

In short, the dual-use mandate—reinforced by Draghi’s urgent call for economic security—presents the European industry with a clear challenge: scale up, specialize and integrate, or risk ceding both commercial leadership and strategic autonomy to foreign competitors.

The post The great inversion: Why defense now relies on industry—and what Draghi demands appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post The great inversion: Why defense now relies on industry—and what Draghi demands appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Why innovation needs a network: key trends and predictions in new business creation

Corporate innovation isn’t a new game. It’s been evolving since the early days of industrial giants like Ford and GE. Back then, innovation was in-house and tightly controlled. Today’s innovation landscape looks nothing like it did back then. Now it’s open, networked, and global.

Innovation no longer thrives in isolation. It thrives in ecosystems: webs of internal teams, start-ups, universities, and research institutions. These networks aren’t optional. They’re how companies unlock fresh ideas, reduce risk, and bring new products and ventures to market faster.

Look at today’s leaders—Google, Amazon, Apple. Their ability to scale innovation comes from open collaboration, continuous experimentation, and a strong connection to the external world. This is the new playbook for corporate innovation.

So, what’s next? Here are the top trends shaping the future of corporate innovation—and why they matter.

1. Smarter, hybrid innovation models are taking over

Companies are stepping away from rigid approaches and adopting more flexible, hybrid innovation models. The Venture Client model—buying from start-ups—is still popular, but more corporations are becoming venture builders, launching new businesses internally or in partnership with start-ups. It’s not just about sourcing innovation anymore—it’s about creating it.

2. Strategic investment in a tight economy

Even in uncertain times, the best-performing companies continue to invest in innovation. The trend? Smarter, more strategic bets on fewer, high-impact initiatives that align directly with business goals.

3. Impact matters more than ever

Innovation teams are under pressure to show results. More organizations are adopting multidimensional KPIs to track strategic, technological, sustainability, and financial outcomes. The hardest part? Measuring cultural transformation—how innovation is shifting mindsets across the organization.

4. The global innovation map is expanding

While Silicon Valley and Israel still lead in start-up activity, other regions are gaining ground. From the U.S. East Coast to Europe, MENA, South Korea, China, and Australia—there’s a growing interest from corporates looking to collaborate with start-ups and research partners globally.

5. Generative AI & deep tech are setting the pace

Emerging technologies are becoming central to innovation strategies. Generative AI is transforming workflows, product design, and customer experience. Deep Tech—think quantum computing, synthetic biology, and next-gen materials—is where corporations are placing their boldest bets.

What it all means for you

If you’re responsible for innovation—or simply want to be part of what’s next—keep these principles in mind:

• Go hybrid: Combine internal innovation with strategic partnerships.
• Invest with intention: Focus on high-impact, business-aligned initiatives.
• Measure what matters: Capture both business results and cultural impact to tell the full story.
• Think beyond borders: Innovation knows no borders, neither should your strategy.
• Embrace emerging tech: AI and frontier technologies are where the next wave of growth will come from.

Innovation today is fast, collaborative, and deeply integrated across disciplines. The companies that lead won’t just adapt to change—they’ll help shape it.

New business creation strategies to turn innovation into action

The future of corporate innovation isn’t about doing more—it’s about doing it smarter. To lead in this evolving landscape, companies need to reimagine how they build new ventures, form partnerships, and integrate innovation across their core.

Success increasingly depends on blending strategic thinking with capabilities in design, technology, and finance. It’s not just about generating ideas—it’s about shaping them into scalable, sustainable business models.

Organizations that embrace ecosystems, explore emerging technologies, and align innovation with strategic priorities will be best positioned to create lasting impact.

If you’re exploring how to take your innovation strategy further—from bold ideas to real-world ventures—we’re here to help you move forward with focus and confidence. Let’s start a conversation about what’s next.

The post Corporate innovation: What’s shaping the future of new business creation appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Corporate innovation: What’s shaping the future of new business creation appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

Why peat is so tricky to handle

Peat, essentially decayed plants, is tough to deal with. It often contains pollutants, soaks up water like a sponge, and releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, when it breaks down. These traits make it a difficult material to manage in an environmentally responsible way. It’s clear that traditional methods won’t work long-term, and we need some fresh thinking to tackle this problem.

How strategic sourcing is driving the solution

The Flemish government, through its Innovation and Entrepreneurship Agency (VLAIO), is taking a forward-thinking approach to tackle this issue by embracing strategic sourcing of innovation. Instead of relying on outdated disposal methods, they’re looking for creative, sustainable technologies that can help process and store dredged peat in a way that makes environmental sense.

Here’s how strategic sourcing is powering this transformation:

Pre-commercial procurement (PCP)

One key part of the plan is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP), where the government is co-funding the development of technologies that haven’t hit the market yet. This method encourages private companies to team up with public bodies to come up with innovative solutions. By setting performance goals and testing new ideas, the government is creating a space where fresh, practical solutions can take root.

Focus on sustainability

At the heart of this initiative is a commitment to sustainability. The goal is to find solutions that not only reduce environmental harm but also create value. Whether it’s cutting methane emissions or turning dredged peat into materials for bioenergy production or soil improvement, the project is all about recycling waste and contributing to a circular economy.

Pilot projects

To make sure the proposed solutions work in the real world, pilot projects are being developed and tested. These trials are critical for assessing the practicality of the solutions before they’re scaled up for broader use. It’s about getting things right on the ground before going big.

Changing the game for dredging and climate action

This initiative has the potential to completely change how we handle dredged material, and the environmental benefits could be significant:

• Lower greenhouse gas emissions: New processing methods could cut down on methane emissions from peat and even capture carbon.
• Resource recovery: Some of the proposed solutions could allow us to pull valuable resources from the peat, like organic matter for soil or materials for bioenergy production.
• Environmental protection: By moving away from traditional disposal methods, we can protect marine ecosystems and ease the pressure on landfills.

How strategic sourcing drives innovation

The success of this project is really about strategic sourcing—a process that taps into external expertise and encourages collaboration to solve tough environmental problems. Verhaert Strategic Innovation plays a crucial role in supporting the Flemish government’s goals by helping connect the right people, ideas, and solutions. This approach includes:

• Market consultation: Engaging with dredging companies, research institutions, and technology providers to gain a deep understanding of the sector’s challenges and opportunities.
• Technology scouting: Identifying and assessing emerging technologies that could offer viable solutions for peat processing and storage.
• Facilitating collaboration: Helping to establish partnerships between the government and potential solution providers, ensuring a cohesive approach to innovation and problem-solving.

A collaborative approach to facilitate innovation

The “Duurzaam Verwerken en Bergen van Venige Specie” project shows just how powerful strategic sourcing can be in driving environmental innovation. By focusing on research, collaboration, and the right expertise, the Flemish government is laying the groundwork for a sustainable future in dredging and port activities.

If you’re dealing with similar challenges or just want to see how strategic sourcing could help you tackle complex issues in your own field, let’s talk. We can explore ways to collaborate and come up with solutions that not only work but create lasting, positive change.

The post Turning peat into progress: Strategic sourcing of sustainable solutions for dredged material in Flanders appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Turning peat into progress: Strategic sourcing of sustainable solutions for dredged material in Flanders appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The three pillars of a strong value proposition

At Verhaert, we believe a winning value proposition must be desirable, competitive and sustainable. It needs to resonate with customers, stand out from the competition and align with your company’s strengths and capabilities.

1. Desirable from a customer point of view

To win over customers, your value proposition needs to be truly compelling. It should address their pain points, fulfill their needs and offer a clear benefit they find worth investing in. This can take the form of:

• Convenience: Does your offering make life easier or more convenient for customers? Think of the Nespresso coffee machine which revolutionized home coffee brewing with its single-serve capsules and ease of use.
• Cost savings: Can your offering help customers save money or reduce costs? Consider LED lighting solutions that offer significant energy savings compared to traditional incandescent bulbs.
• Unique experience: Will your solution provide a truly different and attractive experience? Take the example of virtual reality headsets that immerse users in virtual worlds, offering a unique form of entertainment and education.
• Empowerment: Do you enable customers to do something they couldn’t before? Telehealth platforms, for example, empower patients to access healthcare remotely, overcoming geographical barriers and improving access to care.

2. Competitive from a market point of view

In a crowded marketplace, standing out is crucial. Your value proposition should highlight what sets your offering apart and why it’s the smartest choice. Think about:

• Superior performance: Is your solution superior to competitors in terms of quality, features or functionality? Think of high-performance athletic wear that leverages innovative materials and design to enhance performance and comfort.
• Unique features: What unique aspects set your offering apart from existing alternatives? Consider smartphones with advanced camera capabilities that capture professional-quality photos and videos.
• Disruptive innovation: Does your offering disrupt the market with a completely new approach or technology? Tesla’s electric vehicles disrupted the automotive industry with their focus on sustainability and performance.

3. Sustainable from a company point of view

For long-term success, your value proposition must also work for your business. It should build on your strengths, support your strategic direction and be financially sound. Consider:

• Unique expertise: Do you leverage your company’s unique knowledge, experience or assets? Think of a pharmaceutical company developing a new drug based on its extensive research and development capabilities.
• Proprietary technology: Are you using proprietary technology or intellectual property that gives you a competitive advantage? Consider a software company with patented algorithms that enable advanced data analysis and decision-making.
• Sustainable business model: Does your offering support a sustainable business model that generates profits and enables long-term growth? Think of a subscription-based service that provides recurring revenue and fosters customer loyalty.

A vision of value: Industry-specific applications

Imagine a future where every industry resonates with its customers on a profound level, delivering value that truly transforms lives. In Medtech, this means pioneering minimally invasive solutions that not only enhance surgical precision but also dramatically shorten recovery times, empowering patients to reclaim their lives faster. Obviously, other industries have other value drivers. For instance, in the fast-paced world of FMCG, it could be about crafting delectable, plant-based products that nourish both body and planet, meeting the rising demand for sustainable, healthy living.

Good value propositions resonate with what keeps people awake. Many home automation innovations capitalize upon building intelligent, intuitive security systems that provide unparalleled peace of mind, seamlessly integrating into the modern home. While in construction, the revolutionizing housing with 3D printing, creates affordable, eco-friendly homes that shape the cities of tomorrow. We truly believe we can reinvent ourselves to create a better world when we focus on crafting value propositions that are not just desirable, but competitively superior and sustainably impactful, driving growth and positive change across every sector.

Building a lasting impact

A strong value proposition is the foundation of any successful business. By focusing on desirability, competitiveness, and sustainability, you can create an offering that resonates with your target audience, drives business growth, and sets you apart in the marketplace. Ultimately, a winning value proposition isn’t static, it evolves with market needs, competitive pressures and company strengths. By continuously refining and validating it, businesses can stay ahead and create lasting impact.

The post Crafting a winning value proposition: The recipe for success appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.

The post Crafting a winning value proposition: The recipe for success appeared first on Verhaert Masters in Innovation.